Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Markus Schaber
Тема Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ?
Дата
Msg-id 42233CDA.3030407@logi-track.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на is pg_autovacuum so effective ?  (Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>)
Ответы Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ?
Список pgsql-performance
Hi, Matthew,

Matthew T. O'Connor schrieb:

> The version of pg_autovacuum that I submitted for 8.0 could be
> instructed "per table" but it didn't make the cut.  Aside from moved out
> of contrib and integrated into the backend, per table autovacuum
> settings is probably the next highest priority.

What was the reason for non-acceptance?

Is it available as a standalone project?


Markus
--
markus schaber | dipl. informatiker
logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 zürich
phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53
mailto:schabios@logi-track.com | www.logi-track.com

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Arthurs
Дата:
Сообщение: PG block sizes
Следующее
От: "Matthew T. O'Connor"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ?