Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Christopher Kings-Lynne
Тема Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question
Дата
Msg-id 421DEC77.70500@familyhealth.com.au
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> My results are:
> Fisrt, baseline:
> * Linux, with fsync (default), write-cache disabled: no data corruption
> * Linux, with fsync (default), write-cache enabled: usually no data
> corruption, but two runs which had
> * Win32, with fsync, write-cache disabled: no data corruption
> * Win32, with fsync, write-cache enabled: no data corruption
> * Win32, with osync, write cache disabled: no data corruption
> * Win32, with osync, write cache enabled: no data corruption. Once I
> got:
> 2005-02-24 12:19:54 LOG:  could not open file "C:/Program
> Files/PostgreSQL/8.0/data/pg_xlog/000000010000000000000010" (log file 0,
> segment 16): No such file or directory

In case anyone is wondering, you can turn off write caching on FreeBSD, 
for a terrible perfomance loss...

http://freebsd.active-venture.com/handbook/configtuning-disk.html#AEN8015

Chris


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question