Re: Timestamp vs. Interval and formatting....
| От | Michael Glaesemann |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Timestamp vs. Interval and formatting.... |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 421D3F1A-3EF7-11D8-BA4F-000A95C88220@myrealbox.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Timestamp vs. Interval and formatting.... (Dan Jewett <dan@thenormalfamily.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Timestamp vs. Interval and formatting....
|
| Список | pgsql-novice |
Hi Dan,
On Jan 4, 2004, at 2:11 PM, Dan Jewett wrote:
> I've been building an application to catalog my CD collection, and have
> been merrily adding the track lengths to a field of type "interval".
> This seemed to make the most sense if I wanted to do math on them (ie.
> totals) later on. Everything was working well until I realized that
> tracks over 24 minutes were being returned as "1 day HH:MM". What is
> the easiest way to limit the field to MM:SS?
As you've noticed, your intention of inserting MM:SS is being
interpreted by PostgreSQL as HH::MM instead. Here's what worked for me:
test=# create table track_length (trackid int, length interval);
CREATE TABLE
test=# insert into track_length values (1,'1 min 32 sec');
INSERT 1196294 1
test=# select * from track_length;
trackid | length
---------+----------
1 | 00:01:32
(1 row)
Your system is probably more complex than this, but you can see how it
works. Check out the following link for more details.
<http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/datatype-
datetime.html#AEN4289>
Does this help?
Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: