Re: Patch for disaster recovery

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>I think the only real effect of this patch will be to confuse people
>>who are reading the source code.  tqual.c is already complicated and
>>fragile enough --- it doesn't need conditionally compiled "features"
>>that we can't even explain the use of.
>
>
> I need a note somewhere to remember where to tell people to modify the
> code to recovery something.  Do you have a better idea?  You want just a
> comment rather than a define?

A short guide to disaster recovery would be useful. There's a real
shortage of people qualified to help users in this situation. I feel
comfortable in telling them what *not* to do, but nothing more.

--
   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd