Tom Lane wrote:
>Maybe
>
>(a) within 200,000 transactions of wrap, every transaction start
>delivers a WARNING message;
>
>(b) within 100,000 transactions, forced shutdown as above.
>
>
>
>
This seems sound enough, but if the DBA and/or SA can't be bothered
reading the docs where this topic features quite prominently, I suspect
the warning messages won't have much effect either. Basically ISTM we're
talking about people who *need* a clue howitzer.
This will possibly hit us more now we have the Windows port (or maybe
not, if the Windows servers are regularly rebooted ;-) )
cheers
andrew