Re: Inheritance planner CPU and memory usage change since 9.3.2
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Inheritance planner CPU and memory usage change since 9.3.2 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4211.1434656143@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Inheritance planner CPU and memory usage change since 9.3.2 (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Inheritance planner CPU and memory usage change since 9.3.2
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm a bit surprised that duplicating the append_rel_list is a noticeable
>> performance problem. It ought to be far smaller than the Query tree that
>> we've always duplicated in this loop --- in particular, it's really a
>> subset of what we have in the RTE list, no?
> Well, append_rel_list has an AppendRelInfo for every RTE and that
> contains a List (translated_vars) which in turn contains a Var node
> for every column. I'm not sure how that compares to the RTE itself.
RTEs also have a per-column component, namely the lists of column alias
names. So there's something odd going on here. I'll dig into it when
I get a chance (possibly not during PGCon).
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: