"Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 16:40 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I wonder whether this has any implications for HOT ...
> My general feeling, expressed in a number of recent posts was that the
> VACUUM FULL code really isn't worth the trouble it causes. Especially
> when CLUSTER does a better job anyway?
Point A: we have to fix the back branches anyway.
Point B: until we have an MVCC-safe CLUSTER, that is not a substitute.
regards, tom lane