Re: Remove "Source Code" column from \df+ ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Remove "Source Code" column from \df+ ?
Дата
Msg-id 41a333df-992f-8af0-da33-d26c28a0c877@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Remove "Source Code" column from \df+ ?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Remove "Source Code" column from \df+ ?  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: Remove "Source Code" column from \df+ ?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 10/12/16 11:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not sure that Peter was voting for retaining "internal name", but
> personally I prefer that to deleting prosrc entirely, so +1.

I'm not sure what the point of showing the internal name would be if we
have already declared that the source code of non-C functions is not
that interesting.  But I don't have a strong feeling about it.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Vitaly Burovoy
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: macaddr 64 bit (EUI-64) datatype support
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Remove "Source Code" column from \df+ ?