Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
| От | Steve Wampler |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 41EFD0D4.8050604@noao.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering (Hervé Piedvache <herve@elma.fr>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Hervé Piedvache wrote: > Le Jeudi 20 Janvier 2005 16:23, Dave Cramer a écrit : > >>Google uses something called the google filesystem, look it up in >>google. It is a distributed file system. > > > Yes that's another point I'm working on ... make a cluster of server using > GFS ... and making PostgreSQL running with it ... A few years ago I played around with GFS, but not for postgresql. I don't think it's going to help - logically there's no difference between putting PG on GFS and putting PG on NFS - in both cases the filesystem doesn't provide any support for distributing the task at hand - and a PG database server isn't written to be distributed across hosts regardless of the distribution of the data across filesystems. -- Steve Wampler -- swampler@noao.edu The gods that smiled on your birth are now laughing out loud.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: