Re: TAP test command_fails versus command_fails_like
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TAP test command_fails versus command_fails_like |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 419ce961-fda6-4b24-b5c2-fde414065c70@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TAP test command_fails versus command_fails_like (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: TAP test command_fails versus command_fails_like
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-02-12 We 8:58 AM, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: > >> Another question is whether command_fails and command_fails_like is >> the only pair or there are more which need stricter checks? > If we do this, we should do it across the board for > PostgreSQL::Test::Utils and ::Cluster at least. Once we bump the > minimum perl version to 5.20 or beyond we should switch to using > function signatures (https://perldoc.perl.org/perlsub#Signatures), which > gives us this checking for free. > Is there any reason we can't move to 5.20? Are there any buildfarm animals using such an old version? 5.20 is now almost 10 years old. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: