Re: Why frequently updated tables are an issue

pgsql@mohawksoft.com wrote a few months ago:

>PostgreSQL's behavior on these cases is poor. I don't think anyone who has
>tried to use PG for this sort of thing will disagree, and yes it is
>getting better. Does anyone else consider this to be a problem? If so, I'm
>open for suggestions on what can be done. I've suggested a number of
>things, and admittedly they have all been pretty weak ideas, but they were
>potentially workable.
>
>  
>
What about a dblink style interface to a non-MVCC SQL database?
I think someone on this list mentioned that there are open source 
in-memory SQL databases.

--   Manfred