Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> If Firefox decided to drop the XML configuration storage approach in
>> favor of using a (perhaps quasi-embedded, in the way it _could_ be
>> done) PostgreSQL instance, that would be a good excuse.
>>
>>
> IMHO that is a bad use for PostgreSQL and a better use for SQLite.
> PostgreSQL is a farily
> heavy process to be a book mark manager.
>
I have actually thought that a gconf backend using a transactional store
might be nice. Especially for network administration of desktops...
PostgreSQL might be nice for this. How it would compare to LDAP, I
don't know though....
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
Metatron Technology Consulting