Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Performance on Win32 vs Cygwin

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Reini Urban
Тема Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Performance on Win32 vs Cygwin
Дата
Msg-id 416ED64B.3070000@x-ray.at
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Performance on Win32 vs Cygwin  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
Список pgsql-performance
Magnus Hagander schrieb:
> IIRC, previous versions of postgresql (< 8.0) did not correctly sync
> disks when running on Cygwin. I'm not 100% sure, can someone confirm?
> 8.0 does, and I beleive it does both under native win32 and cygwin.

yes, sync is a NOOP on cygwin.

> It's been my experience that the native version is slightly faster than
> the cygwin one, but I've only compared 8.0 to 8.0.

Sure. This is expected. Cygwin's interim's layer costs a lot of time.
(process handling, path resolution)
--
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "MikeSmialek2@Hotmail.com"
Дата:
Сообщение: Performance on Win32 vs Cygwin
Следующее
От: Gavin Sherry
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Select with qualified join condition / Batch inserts