Re: Function editor

Dave Page wrote:

> 
> 
> You already added it to dlgFunction etc. when you made them sizeable in
> order to enlarge the function body textbox. We should aim for
> consistency - either all dialogues are fixed (and appropriate fields can
> be editted in a pop-off editor or similar), or they are not - hence both
> of my suggestions so far.

This is restricted to dlgs that really need it. One death has to be 
died: accept uglyness for two property dlgs or having them nearly 
unusable. All other dlgs are perfect, dont spoil them.

Regards,
Andreas