Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring
Дата
Msg-id 4169.1537881834@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring  (Chris Travers <chris.travers@adjust.com>)
Ответы Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring  (Chris Travers <chris.travers@adjust.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Chris Travers <chris.travers@adjust.com> writes:
> However,  what I think one could do is use a struct of volatile
> sig_atomic_t members and macros for checking/setting.  Simply writing a
> value is safe in C89 and higher.

Yeah, we could group those flags in a struct, but what's the point?

            regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Surafel Temesgen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works