Re: Initcap works differently with different locale providers
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Initcap works differently with different locale providers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 415a8ce2-7b15-4fd0-b82a-1d13aba754ed@eisentraut.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Initcap works differently with different locale providers (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Initcap works differently with different locale providers
Re: Initcap works differently with different locale providers |
Список | pgsql-docs |
On 04.08.25 22:59, Jeff Davis wrote: > On Mon, 2025-08-04 at 12:30 +0700, Oleg Tselebrovskiy wrote: >> First patch just adds this warning about not relying on initcap() >> exact >> result. The second one is the same, but removes the part "what is a >> word" >> since it's could be moot because we recommend writing custom >> functions, >> so understanding what is a word is not exactly needed. Still on the >> fence >> about which patch is better, though > > One more thing: we should also change it to "... to upper case (or > title case) and the rest to lower case...". Title case is for scripts > that have characters like 'Dž' (U+01C5). > > Other than that I like the second version, which un-documents the > specific word boundary rules. I'll admit I'm not quite sure how people > use this function in practice, but I expect that it's mostly convenient > (or lazy) display. It's meant to be an Oracle-compatible function, so maybe someone can check there for some details. https://docs.oracle.com/en/database/oracle/oracle-database/18/sqlrf/INITCAP.html I think we should try to document the behavior more precisely. But we probably first have to agree what it should be. > Alexander, is there a reason you backported this change? I don't > normally backport doc improvements like this, but I'm not sure what > standard others use. The fact that it's on 7 branches makes me more > reluctant to commit these extra improvements on top. Can you take care > of these follow-up patches? Or, just revert the change and I can make > the improvements in master. Yes, I was not in favor of backpatching this, since it was not a bug fix. And it turns out it was incomplete. I think we should revert all the backpatches and iterate on getting the documentation the way we want in master.
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: