Re: Text Search vs MYSQL vs Lucene
| От | David Garamond |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Text Search vs MYSQL vs Lucene |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 414077B7.5080808@zara.6.isreserved.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Text Search vs MYSQL vs Lucene (Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Steve Atkins wrote: >>What would be performance of pgSQL text search vs MySQL vs Lucene (flat >>file) for a 2 terabyte db? >>thanks for any comments. > > My experience with tsearch2 has been that indexing even moderately > large chunks of data is too slow to be feasible. Moderately large > meaning tens of megabytes. My experience with MySQL's full text search as well as the various MySQL-based text indexing programs (forgot the names, it's been a while) for some 10-20GB of mail archives has been pretty disappointing too. My biggest gripe is with the indexing speed. It literally takes days to index less than a million documents. I ended up using Swish++. Microsoft's CHM compiler also has pretty amazing indexing speed (though it crashes quite often when encountering bad HTML). -- dave
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: