Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Stark
Тема Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Дата
Msg-id 4136ffa0809080618v1d63a4f4m474c65ec8f999b0f@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> But of course case insensitivity isn't going to fix that example for you.
> So we're right back at the question of where we should draw the line in
> trying to accept variant input.

Well it's not a perfect precedent but for example, dd accepts:

G    (2^30)
M    (2^20)
k     (2^10)
K    (2^10)
Kb  (10^3)
MB (10^6)
GB (10^9)
b    (512)

I think we're all agreed we want to ignore the KiB crap and make all
our units base 2. And I don't think usin "b" for block makes sense for
us. But the point is that yes, people expect to type "100M" or "1G"
and have that work. Plenty of us do it all the time with dd or other
tools already.

-- 
greg


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Martin Pihlak
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: reducing statistics write overhead
Следующее
От: Zdenek Kotala
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Prototype: In-place upgrade v02