Cott Lang wrote:
> My best NFS results were within about 15% of the speed of my best SAN
> results.
Good info, and consistent with what I've seen.
> However, my results changed drastically under the 2.6 kernel, when the
> NFS results stayed about the same as 2.4, but the SAN jumped about 50%
> in transactions per second.
>
Very interesting. Whose SAN are you using that supports the 2.6 kernel?
Thanks,
Joe