> I think the speed complaint I was just raising could possibly be
> answered by setting an infomask bit indicating that the row might
> be present in a separate table of active row locks. (I'm not sure
> how the bit would get cleared without race conditions, but let's
> suppose that can be done.) A little hashing, a little spill-to-disk
> logic, and it might be done. But that's just handwaving... anyone
> want to try to fill in the details?
I vote Alvaro :) This stuff is way out of my league - I'm just the
ideas man :D
Either way - Bruce, did you want to add a summary of these ideas to the
TODO?
Chris