Le jeudi 21 octobre 2021, 09:21:44 CEST Michael Paquier a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 08:29:54AM +0200, Ronan Dunklau wrote:
> > Ok, do you want me to propose a different patch for previous versions ?
>
> That's not necessary. Thanks for proposing.
>
> > Do you mean restart_lsn as the pointer argument to the function, or
> > restart_lsn as the field returned by the command ? If it's the first, I'll
> > change it but if it's the latter it is expected that we sometime run this
> > on a slot where WAL has never been reserved yet.
>
> restart_lsn as the pointer of the function.
Done. I haven't touched the timeline switch test patch for now, but I still
include it here for completeness.
--
Ronan Dunklau