Re: BUG #7485: 9.2 beta3 libxml2 can't be loaded on Windows
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #7485: 9.2 beta3 libxml2 can't be loaded on Windows |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4121.1345139193@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: BUG #7485: 9.2 beta3 libxml2 can't be loaded on Windows (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Seems pretty brute-force. Why not just
>>>
>>> #if LIBXML_VERSION > 20703
>>> #define HAVE_XMLSTRUCTUREDERRORCONTEXT
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> in some suitable place (probably xml.c itself, since I don't think we
>>> want to #include xmlversion.h in global headers)?
>>>
>>> Or actually, maybe we could just unconditionally define
>>> HAVE_XMLSTRUCTUREDERRORCONTEXT in pg_config.h.win32. Is anybody
>>> likely to still be building PG with ancient libxml on Windows?
>> That works for me. Using older libxml's would be a bad idea anyway -
>> and there are precompiled binaries available, so it's not hard to get.
> Works as in, I'm happy with it. I haven't tested. Though, it'll likely
> break some of the old BF animals (temporarily, I hope).
On the whole plan A sounds safer (ie look at LIBXML_VERSION in place of
using a configure test). I'll work on that tonight or tomorrow, if
nobody beats me to it.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: