Re: [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and
От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 411C327E.7040903@familyhealth.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Yep, a whole section for pg_dump features and bugs would be nice. Bruce Momjian wrote: > Do you want any of these added to the TODO? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > >>And I forgot to add: >> >>* Allow dumping/restoring of any number of specific objects and types >> >>Chris >> >>Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: >> >> >>>OK, everything for pg_dump TODO I can think of: >>> >>>pg_dump/pg_dumpall/pg_restore >>> >>>* Add dumping of comments on composite type columns >>>* Add dumping of comments on index columns >>>* Replace crude DELETE FROM way of dumping cleaning of users and groups >>>with separate DROP commands >>>* Add dumping and restoring of LOB comments >>>* Stop dumping CASCADE on DROP TYPE commands in clean mode >>>* Add full object name to the tag field. eg. for operators we need >>>'=(integer, integer)', instead of just '='. >>>* Add pg_dumpall custom format dumps. This is probably best done by: >>>* Combining pg_dump and pg_dumpall into a single binary >>>* Export to other database (eg. Oracle, MySQL and DB2) formats >>> >>>I'm hopefully getting the first 4 in for 8.0 release... The full names >>>in tags one should be done really as well at some point. >>> >>>Anyone got anything else? >>> >>>Chris >>> >>>Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Yes, shoot over that the section should contain. >>>> >>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> >>>>Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Perhaps. I was also thinking that maybe it's time to combine >>>>>pg_dumpall and pg_dump into a single utility. At the moment, I can't >>>>>see how pg_dumpall can ever have a -Fc option, since it will be messy >>>>>to interact with the pg_dump processes. >>>>> >>>>>I was thinking a pg_export utility that can output to a range of >>>>>other databases SQL formats would also be a good idea. It would >>>>>share about 90% of the pg_dump code, but I'm trying to think of how >>>>>to avoid duplicating the code. >>>>> >>>>>How about we have a whole pg_dump/dumpall/restore/backup section in >>>>>the TODO file? >>>>> >>>>>Chris >>>>> >>>>>Bruce Momjian wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>TODO item? >>>>>> >>>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I just got an autoreply from David stating he will be away until >>>>>>>>>August >>>>>>>>>9 if we want this functionality we have to code it ourselves. If >>>>>>>>>not it >>>>>>>>>can wait until the next major release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>It can wait --- it was submitted after feature freeze anyway, and we >>>>>>>>certainly have more than enough other things to do in the next >>>>>>>>couple days. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I have a plan to allow pg_dump to dump any object in the next >>>>>>>version - i suspect these two ideas will need reconciliation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Chris >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >>>TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate >>> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your >>> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >> >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:
Предыдущее
От: Bruce MomjianДата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new
Следующее
От: Andrew DunstanДата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and