Josh Berkus wrote:
>Marc,
>
>
>
>>But this comes back to promoting some projects as being more important
>>then others, bestoying(sp?) a pseudo-official status on them ...
>>pginstaller, IMHO, makes sense since its pretty much a requirement for
>>anyone wishing to use Pg 8.0.0 on Windows ...
>>
>>
>
>Yep. That's the way the mainstream press works; they're not interested in
>technical merit of individual projects, they are interested in what's
>currently buzzword-compliant. Replication is sexy, HA is sexy, PITR is
>sexy, high performance is sexy, enterprise Java is sexy. A lot of other
>features and add-ons which are very valuable to the community are not
>interesting to the general press. For the Press Release, which is designed
>to go to reporters, we need to pack it densly with stuff that's going to
>appeal to them.
>
>
>
What about some mention like:
This release is bundled with the open source replication solution,
Slony-I. Other commercial replication solutions are available from
other vendors, such as Command Prompt, Incorporated.
Does this satisfy everyone's needs?
I think that replication should be mentioned in some way as it helps to
tell some people that PostgreSQL is ready for the enterprise. However,
I do agree that we want to avoid leaving people with the idea that this
is *the* end all and be all for PostgreSQL replication.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers