Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4103.1492731555@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2017-04-20 19:23:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> or are the HANDLEs in a Windows WaitEventSet not inheritable >> resources? > I think we have control over that. According to > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms724466(v=vs.85).aspx > CreateProcess() has to be called with bInheritHandles = true (which we > do for backends), and SECURITY_ATTRIBUTES.bInheritHandle has to be true > too. The latter we already only do for InitSharedLatch(), but not for > InitLatch(), nor for the WSACreateEvent's created for sockets - those > apparently can never be inherited. > So that kind of sounds like it should be doable. Ah, good. I'll add a comment about that and press on. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: