Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker

On 4/13/17 06:23, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Attached the latest patch. It didn't actually necessary to change
> GetSubscriptionNotReadyRelations. I just changed the logic refreshing
> the sync table state list.
> Please give me feedback.

I think this is a reasonable direction, but do we really need
table_sync_retry_interval separate from wal_retrieve_retry_interval?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services