Re: [HACKERS] I propose killing PL/Tcl's "modules" infrastructure

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua D. Drake
Тема Re: [HACKERS] I propose killing PL/Tcl's "modules" infrastructure
Дата
Msg-id 40b87715-b594-9106-16bf-f3a520871902@commandprompt.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] I propose killing PL/Tcl's "modules" infrastructure  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] I propose killing PL/Tcl's "modules" infrastructure  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 02/25/2017 10:14 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Now, we could try to fix this bug, and add the regression test coverage
> that the code clearly lacks, and upgrade the documentation about it from
> its currently very sad state.  But I think the right answer is just to
> remove the feature altogether.  It's evidently not being used, and it's
> kind of insecure by design, and it would not be that hard for someone
> to provide equivalent functionality entirely in userland if they really
> wanted it.

I don't see a reason to keep pl/tcl in core at all so ripping out the 
functionality seems the least disruptive and perhaps even a deprecation 
of the PL (at least from a core perspective) in v10.

JD



-- 
Command Prompt, Inc.                  http://the.postgres.company/                        +1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] I propose killing PL/Tcl's "modules" infrastructure
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] btree_gin and btree_gist for enums