Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
| От | Mark Kirkwood |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 40FD9819.50401@coretech.co.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery (Klaus Naumann <kn@mgnet.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
I'd vote for it as a clarity factor too. Klaus Naumann wrote: >On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 markw@osdl.org wrote: > > > >>FATAL: unrecognized configuration parameter "archive_mode" >> >>Have I missed something since it has been committed? >> >> > >Yes, Tom has removed this option in favorite of just setting >archive_command to a value which then enables the PITR code also. > >But as I've seen this isn't discussed to the very end currently. > >My 2ct: I'd prefer to have archive_mode in the config as it really makes >clear that this database is archiving. I fear users will not understand >that giving a program for archival will also enable the PITR function. > >Greetings, Klaus > > > >
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: