Re: Insert are going slower ...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Shridhar Daithankar
Тема
Re: Insert are going slower ...
Дата
Msg-id
40F50742.1000007@frodo.hserus.net
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Insert are going slower ... Hervé Piedvache <herve@elma.fr>
Re: Insert are going slower ... Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Re: Insert are going slower ... Hervé Piedvache <footcow@noos.fr>
Re: Insert are going slower ... Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Re: Insert are going slower ... Hervé Piedvache <footcow@noos.fr>
Re: Insert are going slower ... Hervé Piedvache <footcow@noos.fr>
Re: Insert are going slower ... Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar@frodo.hserus.net>
Re: Insert are going slower ... Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Re: Insert are going slower ... Hervé Piedvache <herve@elma.fr>
Re: Insert are going slower ... Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Re: Insert are going slower ... Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
Re: Insert are going slower ... Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
Re: Insert are going slower ... "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe@qwest.net>
gnari wrote:
> is there a recommended procedure to estimate
> the best value for effective_cache_size on a
> dedicated DB server ?

Rule of thumb(On linux): on a typically loaded machine, observe cache memory of 
the machine and allocate good chunk of it as effective cache.

To define good chunck of it, you need to consider how many other things are 
running on that machine. If it is file server + web server + database server, 
you have to allocate the resources depending upon requirement.

But remember It does not guarantee that it will be a good value. It is just a 
starting point..:-) You have to tune it further if required.

HTH

  Shridhar
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
От: gnari
Дата:
От: Hervé Piedvache
Дата:
FAQ