Re: Bug with view definitions?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Christopher Kings-Lynne
Тема Re: Bug with view definitions?
Дата
Msg-id 40EA1BD0.1060702@familyhealth.com.au
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Bug with view definitions?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Bug with view definitions?
Re: Bug with view definitions?
Список pgsql-hackers
>>  need_paren = (PRETTY_PAREN(context) ?
>>                                !IsA(op->rarg, RangeTblRef) : true);
> 
> 
> In a quick glance this code seems close to completely brain dead :-(
> For one thing, why isn't it making separate determinations about whether
> the left and right inputs of the UNION (resp INTERSECT or EXCEPT)
> operator need to be parenthesized?  After that maybe we could figure out
> what the individual decisions need to be.

So what are we going to do about it?

Was it one of the pgAdmin guys who wrote it in the first place?

Chris



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Marc G. Fournier"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: compile errors in new PL/Pler
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bug with view definitions?