Re: plperl security

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: plperl security
Дата
Msg-id 40E9D767.7050806@dunslane.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: plperl security  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>  
>
>>Tom Lane wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>That would work.  You'd need two state flags instead of just one, but
>>>that doesn't seem bad.
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>
>>'splain please :-)
>>    
>>
>
>Maybe you weren't thinking of the same thing, but what I was imagining
>was one state flag to remember that you'd created the interpreter (and
>loaded the unsafe-func support into it), then a second one to remember
>whether you've loaded the safe-func support.  There are various ways to
>represent this of course, but the point is there need to be three
>persistent states.
>
>
>  
>

Ahh, ok. We already have a state var to remember the first part 
(plperl_firstcall). Just need one new one I think.

cheers

andrew


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Oliver Jowett
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: subtransactions and FETCH behaviour (was Re: PREPARE
Следующее
От: Mike Mascari
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Recovery Features