Re: latest plperl

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Joe Conway said:
>>As a side note, I think it would be *really* helpful if there were a
>>more comprehensive test script, and an expected results file available.
>> Not sure though if it could be included in the standard regression
>>tests  on a configure-conditional basis -- anyone know?
>
> To the best of my knowledge you cannot. We will provide an analogue for
> pltcl's test directory shortly, if that is desired - it will probably take a
> few days, though. I assume that will be acceptable after feature freeze?

Yup, I think that falls into Tom's "loose ends" category.

>
> At a quick glance, modulo the makefile change, the patch looks good.

Great! I'll commit shortly.

Thanks,

Joe