Re: Index oddity

> If I take away the diagonalSize condition in my query I find that there
> are 225 rows that satisfy the other conditions.  155 of these have a
> diagonalSize value of exactly 50.000, while the remaining 70 rows all
> have values larger than 50.  Thus there is a big discrete jump in the
> number of rows at a diagonalSize of 50.  However, the statistics are off
> by two orders of magnitude in guessing how many rows there are going to
> be in this case and thus is not using my index.  How can I fix that?

Maybe you should drop your random_page_cost to something less than 4,
eg. 3 or even 2...

Chris