Re: thread safety tests

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jan Wieck
Тема Re: thread safety tests
Дата
Msg-id 40C735A1.90104@Yahoo.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на thread safety tests  (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>)
Ответы Re: thread safety tests  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: thread safety tests  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 6/9/2004 11:45 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Jan Wieck wrote:
>> The problem is that if your thread-safety tests fail, there is no way to 
>> build libpq with -pthread and -DREENTRANT or whatever is required on 
>> that platform. On Solaris this results in errno being defined as
>> 
>>      extern int errno;
>> 
>> as supposed to
>> 
>>      #define errno *(errno())
>> 
>> which makes libpq on Solaris completely useless for every program that 
>> uses threads for "something". There is still value in compiling it with 
>> thread support compiler flags, even if it will not result in a thread 
>> safe libpq.
> 
> Well, first we should find out how to get the thread test to pass for
> that patform, but for cases where we can't (FreeBSD doesn't have
> getpwuid_r(), we are stuck.  (That might be your Solaris problem as
> well.)

There is no problem with thread safety on Solaris. The configure script 
for 7.4.2 is broken for it, leading to a broken libpq when using 
--enable-thread-safey.

> 
> I looked over the code and the only place getpwuid_r (through
> pqGetpwuid) is used is in libpq to look up the default username based on
> the euid for the connection to the backend.  Unfortunately, I can't find
> any other way to do such a lookup in a thread-safe manner unless we do a
> system() or lock/read /etc/passwd ourselves, both of which are ugly.
> 
> I can't imagine how some OS's cannot give us a thread-safe way to do
> this.  
> 
> When FreeBSD can't enable threads in 7.5, folks are going to be upset. 
> In 7.4 we allowed it by having our own C code lock/copy the passwd
> structure, but someone pointed out that calls to getpwuid() in other
> places in the client code don't have such locking, so it would not work,
> so it was removed for 7.5.

I disagree that all or nothing is a good strategy. What you have changed 
this to is to deny using PostgreSQL from multithreaded applications on 
platforms that have no getpwuid_r() altogether, if their platform 
happens to require any thread special compiler options for libpq to work 
in general.

Take Slony as an example. It is multithreaded, and we aren't happy that 
we have to guard the pg_connect() call with a mutex against multiple 
concurrent calls. But since our connections are of long living nature 
this is no problem. And nowhere else in the entire code is any call to 
getpwuid() or anything else. So we have the situation under control. But 
I really don't want to tell people in the build instructions that they 
have to edit libpq's Makefile because PostgreSQL's ./configure script is 
too restrictive.

And just to make your day, your tests for thread safety are incomplete. 
The reason why we use a mutex now on all platforms, thread safe or not, 
is because in the event you have a kerberos lib available (which is not 
thread safe), pg_connect() can crash wether you use kerberos or not. So 
I think when compiling for --enable-thread-safe we should disable 
kerberos in libpq, right?


Jan

-- 
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Frequently updated tables
Следующее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Assignment to array elements