Re: have you seen this?
От | Dan Langille |
---|---|
Тема | Re: have you seen this? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 40B60BA6.18988.102DF3C4@localhost обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: have you seen this? (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 27 May 2004 at 15:28, Neil Conway wrote: > Alexey Borzov wrote: > > I'd like to suggest doing the same things in technical perspective: why > > implementing the functionality on client side is *bad*, length of > > MySQL's release cycles, creating some "switching" stories, this kind of > > stuff. > > I am opposed to "advocating PostgreSQL" in this manner (regardless > of how effective it may or may not be). Promoting PostgreSQL ought > to be centered on explaining why PostgreSQL is a good DBMS, not > trash-talking the competition. Neil is not alone in this position. If we can't stand on our merits, we should pack up and go home. > We should have faith that our users > are capable of evaluating their database options and choosing the > one that suites their needs best (which may or may not be > PostgreSQL; I think Josh's point that SQLLite / MySQL are adequate > for many people is a good one). I have no problem directing people to the right tool for the job. Sometimes that tool is PostgreSQL. Sometimes it is not. PostgreSQL cannot please everyone all the time. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ BSDCan - http://www.bsdcan.org/
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: