Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC?
| От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 409866CC.2050705@familyhealth.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC?
Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I remember going through this. Other backends will use pg_subtrans to > know what transactions are in progress. They have to do the standard > lookups to find the status of the parent transaction. The backend-local > list of xids is needed so the commit can clean up those subtransaction > xids so that later transactions don't have to use pg_subtrans. Is there some solution whereby the common case (99.999% of transactions won't be subtransactoins) is fast, and the uncommon case of being in a subtransaction is slower? Chris
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: