Re: PITR Phase 2 - Design Planning
| От | Mike Mascari |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PITR Phase 2 - Design Planning |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4091541E.6080604@mascari.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PITR Phase 2 - Design Planning (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 16:09, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Perhaps that was the inspiration, but no, I definitely meant a > CHECKPOINT. > > But now you come to mention it, it would be better just to have a > command that simply wrote a named record to the xlog, so it can > be searched for later... > > COMMENT [IN TRANSACTION LOG] 'starting payroll Feb04' FWFW, Oracle's COMMIT syntax has an optional COMMENT specifier which is used for documenting a distributed transaction. In-doubt transactions can then be manually committed or aborted by referencing the transaction associated with the comment. Example: COMMIT WORK COMMENT 'A complex distributed Tx'; Perhaps there is some common ground between the 2PC implementation and PITR? Mike Mascari
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: