Re: gothic_moth, codlin_moth failures on REL8_2_STABLE

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Stark
Тема Re: gothic_moth, codlin_moth failures on REL8_2_STABLE
Дата
Msg-id 407d949e1003110724t63639e56v9b223088b82f461a@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на gothic_moth, codlin_moth failures on REL8_2_STABLE  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: gothic_moth, codlin_moth failures on REL8_2_STABLE  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Re: gothic_moth, codlin_moth failures on REL8_2_STABLE  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: gothic_moth, codlin_moth failures on REL8_2_STABLE  (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> My conclusion is that this is probably a compiler bug.  Both buildfarm
> animals appear to be using Sun Studio, although on different
> architectures which weakens the compiler-bug theory a bit.  Even though
> we are not seeing the failure in later PG branches, it would probably be
> worth looking into more closely, because if it's biting 8.2 it could
> start biting newer code as well.  But without access to a machine
> showing the problem it is difficult to do much.


Could be this:

http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6750087

It's fixed in patch 124861-11 which came out Feb 23, 2009. Is this
patch missing on both gothic-moth and codlin-moth?

I suppose it's possible to have a configure test to check for whether
this patch is present but I'm not sure how much it's worthwhile given
that it'll only help people who happen to recompile their 8.2 server
after the next Postgres patch. And I'm not sure we can check for
patches without assuming the CC is the OS-shipped cc. Does cc itself
have an option to list which patches it has applied to it?

--
greg


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Dyamic updates of NEW with pl/pgsql
Следующее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: gothic_moth, codlin_moth failures on REL8_2_STABLE