Re: select count(*) very slow on an already vacuumed table.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Rajesh Kumar Mallah
Тема Re: select count(*) very slow on an already vacuumed table.
Дата
Msg-id 407DA257.6010904@trade-india.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: select count(*) very slow on an already vacuumed table.  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
Richard Huxton wrote:

>On Wednesday 14 April 2004 18:53, Rajesh Kumar Mallah wrote:
>
>
>>Hi
>>I have .5 million rows in a table. My problem is select count(*) takes
>>ages. VACUUM FULL does not help. can anyone please tell me
>>how to i enhance the performance of the setup.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>SELECT count(*) from eyp_rfi;
>>
>>
>
>If this is the actual query you're running, and you need a guaranteed accurate
>result, then you only have one option: write a trigger function to update a
>table_count table with every insert/delete to eyp_rfi.
>
>

it is just an example. in general all the queries that involves eyp_rfi
become slow. reloading the table makes the query faster.

mallah.

>There is loads of info on this (and why it isn't as simple as you might think)
>in the archives. First though:
>1. Is this the actual query, or just a representation?
>2. Do you need an accurate figure or just something "near enough"?
>
>
>


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Simon Riggs"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL and Linux 2.6 kernel.
Следующее
От: Rajesh Kumar Mallah
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: select count(*) very slow on an already vacuumed table.