Re: Proposal to introduce a shuffle function to intarray extension

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Proposal to introduce a shuffle function to intarray extension
Дата
Msg-id 4077925.1658029046@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Proposal to introduce a shuffle function to intarray extension  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Proposal to introduce a shuffle function to intarray extension  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Re: Proposal to introduce a shuffle function to intarray extension  (Martin Kalcher <martin.kalcher@aboutsource.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
I wrote:
> On the whole, I'd vote for calling it shuffle(), and expecting that
> we'd also use that name for any future generic version.

Actually ... is there a reason to bother with an intarray version
at all, rather than going straight for an in-core anyarray function?
It's not obvious to me that an int4-only version would have
major performance advantages.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposal to introduce a shuffle function to intarray extension
Следующее
От: Nathan Bossart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: optimize lookups in snapshot [sub]xip arrays