Re: confusion about this commit "Revert "Skip redundant anti-wraparound vacuums""

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: confusion about this commit "Revert "Skip redundant anti-wraparound vacuums""
Дата
Msg-id 4068553.1685936223@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на confusion about this commit "Revert "Skip redundant anti-wraparound vacuums""  (jiye <jiye_sw@126.com>)
Ответы Re: confusion about this commit "Revert "Skip redundant anti-wraparound vacuums""  (jiye <jiye_sw@126.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
jiye <jiye_sw@126.com> writes:
> in our test enviroment, if one database's have major update operations, autovacuum does not work and cause major
performancedegradation. 
> if found this issue may be resolved by revert this Skip redundant anti-wraparound vacuums · postgres/postgres@2aa6e33
(github.com)commit. 

Please provide a self-contained test case illustrating this report.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: jiye
Дата:
Сообщение: confusion about this commit "Revert "Skip redundant anti-wraparound vacuums""
Следующее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [16Beta1][doc] pgstat: Track time of the last scan of a relation