Re: increasing the default WAL segment size

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: increasing the default WAL segment size
Дата
Msg-id 4062.1472096515@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: increasing the default WAL segment size  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: increasing the default WAL segment size  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> What am I missing?

Maybe nothing.  But I'll point out that of the things that can currently
be configured at initdb time, such as LC_COLLATE, there is not one single
one that matters to walsender/walreceiver.  If you think there is zero
risk involved in introducing a parameter that will matter at that level,
you have a different concept of risk than I do.

If you'd presented some positive reason why we ought to be taking some
risk here, I'd be on board.  But you haven't really.  The current default
value for this parameter is nearly old enough to vote; how is it that
we suddenly need to make it easily configurable?  Let's just change
the value and be happy.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Venkata B Nagothi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: patch proposal
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: increasing the default WAL segment size