Tom Lane wrote:
>also, is it safe to
>assume that a byte sent with send() is *immediately* ready to recv()?
>
>
>
If not presumably you could either sleep for a very small interval
before the recv or select on the socket for a very small interval. Half
a second should be ample, I would think.
This doesn't strike me as a high priority item, but possibly worth
putting on the TODO list? Or I could just include it when I get around
to the rest of the listening address stuff we discussed earlier.
cheers
andrew