Re: WAL write of full pages
| От | Manfred Spraul |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: WAL write of full pages |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 40569C37.1070001@colorfullife.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: WAL write of full pages (Marty Scholes <marty@outputservices.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Marty Scholes wrote: > > 2. Put them on an actual (or mirrored actual) spindle > Pros: > * Keeps WAL and data file I/O separate > Cons: > * All of the non array drives are still slower than the array Are you sure this is a problem? The dbt-2 benchmarks from osdl run on an 8-way Intel computer with several raid arrays distributed to 40 disks. IIRC it generates around 1.5 MB wal logs per second - well withing the capability of a single drive. My laptop can write around 10 MB/sec (measured with dd if=/dev/zero of=fill and vmstat), fast drives should be above 20 MB/sec. How much wal data is generated by large postgres setups? Are there any setups that are limited by the wal logs. -- Manfred
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: