Re: pgsql: Remove unused wait events.

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
> Since this will cause integer values to have different textual enum value
> representations in 14 and 15+, do we want to skip two numbers by assigning the
> next wait event the integer value of WAIT_EVENT_WAL_WRITE incremented by three?
> Or enum integer reuse not something we guarantee against across major versions?

We require a recompile across major versions.  I don't see a reason why
this particular enum needs more stability than any other one.

            regards, tom lane