Josh Berkus wrote:
>Folks,
>
>As we discussed a couple weeks ago, Marc, Andrew, Tim Perdue, Chris Ryan and I
>are testing implementing GForge in place of GBorg for associated projects for
>PostgreSQL.
>
>One thing which was suggested initially was that this new project hosting site
>be at www.postgresql.net with projects being <projectname>.postgresql.net.
>
>However, some of the "porting" team felt that it would be confusing for people
>who typed in www.postgresql.net to be presented with the GForge interface,
>and suggested that we use the domain after what we'll be calling the new
>Tool, namely pgFoundry, thus putting stuff at www.pgFoundry.org and
><projectname>.pgfoundry.org.
>
>So far, only 4 people, total, have expressed opinons on the matter. I'm
>throwing this on Hackers so that members of projects we will be hosting can
>indicate whether they:
>
>A) Favor www.postgresql.net
>B) Favor www.pgfoundry.org
>C) Don't care as long as the porting is relatively painless.
>
>
>
Isn't gforge a pgsql related project itself?
So I'd suggest:
www.postgresql.org -> main PostgreSQL site
gforge.postgresql.org -> gforge interface site
<projectname>.postgresql.org -> gforge hosted projects
Regards,
Andreas