Tom Lane wrote:
>Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>
>
>>This is for the 7.5/HEAD tree, so it is bumped. What we don't do is
>>bump during development.
>>
>>
>
>No, we shouldn't do intermediate bumps during a devel cycle. Andrew,
>did you have an earlier 7.5devel libpq.so installed someplace? If so
>that's the gotcha you have to watch out for. The numbering is intended
>to keep libpqs from different release cycles separate, but not within a
>cycle.
>
>
>
Yes, in the location pointed to by --prefix ...
I fully understand now. And it was fixed by truning off rpath.
Is this gotcha mentioned anywhere in documentation?
cheers
andrew