Re: cvs breakage

Tom Lane wrote:

>Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>  
>
>>This is for the 7.5/HEAD tree, so it is bumped.  What we don't do is
>>bump during development.
>>    
>>
>
>No, we shouldn't do intermediate bumps during a devel cycle.  Andrew,
>did you have an earlier 7.5devel libpq.so installed someplace?  If so
>that's the gotcha you have to watch out for.  The numbering is intended
>to keep libpqs from different release cycles separate, but not within a
>cycle.
>
>  
>

Yes, in the location pointed to by --prefix ...

I fully understand now. And it was fixed by truning off rpath.

Is this gotcha mentioned anywhere in documentation?

cheers

andrew