Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4046.957282753@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
>> A while ago while thinking about a way to make ipcclean better I thunk
>> that perhaps the postmaster should write the keys of the segments it gets
>> to a flat-text file.
> Hmm. Could we write this to a separate shared memory segment? Much
> more likely to be of fixed length and compatible between versions, and
> more likely to exist or not exist with the same behavior as the large
> shared memory segment under discussion??
What happens if you get a key collision with some other application
for that segment? Seems to me that using shmem to remember where you
put your shmem segments is dangerously circular ;-)
The flat text file is not a bad idea, but I think the logic I suggested
yesterday makes it unnecessary...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: