Re: BUG #1083: Insert query reordering interacts badly with
| От | Martin Langhoff (Catalyst IT) |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #1083: Insert query reordering interacts badly with |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 403AF354.5030901@catalyst.net.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: BUG #1083: Insert query reordering interacts badly with NEXTVAL()/CURRVAL() (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane wrote:
>"PostgreSQL Bugs List" <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org> writes:
>
>
>>/* this statement will reverse the order of CURRVAL()/NEXTVAL() to match the
>>column order of the table */
>>INSERT INTO testing (col_b, col_a) VALUES (NEXTVAL('seq'), CURRVAL('seq'));
>>
>>
>
>This is not a bug. The order of evaluation of select-lists and
>values-lists is not defined anywhere in the SQL standard, nor promised
>anywhere in the Postgres documentation.
>
Thanks for the clarification. I am curious, however: I can't find a
means to achieve the same effect in a deterministic manner. Any pointers?
regards,
martin
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin @ Catalyst .Net .NZ Ltd, PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington
WEB: http://catalyst.net.nz/ PHYS: Level 2, 150-154 Willis St
OFFICE: +64(4)916-7224 MOB: +64(21)364-017
Make things as simple as possible, but no simpler - Einstein
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: