Re: [HACKERS] PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version?
Дата
Msg-id 4039.1501277046@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> On 07/27/2017 11:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I wonder if it'd be worth getting the buildfarm
>>> to log the output of "perl -V" so we could get a clearer picture
>>> of what's being tested.

> Looks like this, bit it's rather tedious. I think I might back it out. I
> guess I could also write it to a log file, if we really think we need it.
> <https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=crake&dt=2017-07-28%2018%3A37%3A19>

Yeah, that's awfully verbose :-(.  I suspect most vendors wouldn't bother
with enumerating quite so many patches.

I fixed configure so that it will report what it saw in $Config{ccflags};
that may be sufficient.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning